Electrolux EU 0561 C Bedienungsanleitung Seite 23

  • Herunterladen
  • Zu meinen Handbüchern hinzufügen
  • Drucken
  • Seite
    / 67
  • Inhaltsverzeichnis
  • LESEZEICHEN
  • Bewertet. / 5. Basierend auf Kundenbewertungen
Seitenansicht 22
Vol. 1, N° 2, Summer 1994 EC COMPETITION POLICY NEWSLETTER PAGE 23
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION PROHIBITS, ON A PRELIMINARY BASIS, A CARTEL IN THE DUTCH
CRANE-HIRE SECTOR
The Commission considers that agreements notified by the
Federatie van Nederlandse Kraanverhuurbedrijven (FNK) and
the Stichting Certificatie Kraanverhuurbedrijf (SCK) are
incompatible with Article 85(1) of the EC Treaty. It has
accordingly decided initially to withdraw immunity from the
imposition of fines. It is continuing its examination of the
case with a view to taking a final decision.
The FNK (Dutch crane-hire association) and the SCK (crane
certification association), whose membership comprises
virtually the same firms, have introduced in the Netherlands
an agreement on the certification of mobile cranes. Some
190 crane-hire firms, with a total share of about 75% of the
Dutch market, are parties to the agreement. The agreement
prohibits parties to it from hiring cranes from non-member
firms. Any participating firms that hire cranes from
non-affiliated firms risk expulsion from the system.
Crane-hire firms may be affected not only in the
Netherlands, but also in neighbouring Member States.
On 28 October 1993 the Dutch courts ordered the
withdrawal of the ban on hiring cranes from non-affiliated
firms, pending a formal decision by the Commission on the
matter.
Following a preliminary examination of the agreement, the
Commission considers that the certification system is
incompatible with Article 85(1) of the EC Treaty and that
exemption under Article 85(3) of the EC Treaty is not
justified.
In defence of their conduct, the FNK and the SCK argue that
the SCK certification system gives users the assurance that
safety standards are met.
- In order to qualify for exemption, the FNK and the SCK
must inter alia show that the agreements and/or decisions
by associations of undertakings contribute to improving
the crane-hire business while allowing consumers a fair
share of the resulting benefit. The improvement must
entail objective and appreciable advantages such as to
compensate for any disadvantages they cause in the field
of competition.
- Most of the safety requirements which the SCK imposes
for certifying a crane-hire firm are also imposed by
national safety decrees. Official supervision of compliance
with such provisions is carried out by KeBoMa in
particular. Similarly, most of the non-safety-related
requirements which the SCK imposes, such as those
relating to the payment of tax and social security
contributions, registration with the Chamber of
Commerce, third-party insurance, creditworthiness and
application of the collective labour agreement, are already
covered by statutory provisions. The SCK goes beyond
the statutory requirements by imposing requirements
regarding the manner of conducting business, but that
alone is insufficient reason to regard the restrictions of
competition imposed as indispensable.
Voluntary certification is often useful if it:
- increases the quality and safety of the products and the
ability of the producer or service-provider to meet
particular requirements;
- promotes the free movement of goods in that it establishes
the necessary arrangements in industry for the mutual
recognition of quality and safety standards.
This is not the case with the SCK rules, which is why the
Commission has taken its decision to withdraw immunity
from fines.
The Commission's decision, adopted pursuant to Article
15(6) of Regulation No 17, is only limited in scope.
Agreements notified to the Commission by participants
cannot in principle be subject to the imposition of fines.
However, the Community regulations allow the Commission
to withdraw such immunity if it considers that the practices
are reprehensible.
The proceeding will continue with a view to the adoption of
a final decision by the Commission. IP/94/303
COMMISSION RULES ON COMPLAINT LODGED BY TAT (PARIS-LONDON)
The Commission has decided that the French authorities can
no longer refuse to allow Community air carriers to exercise
traffic rights on the Paris-London route operating from Orly
airport. The Commission's decision, which will be published
in the Official Journal of the European Communities, is in
response to a complaint lodged with the Commission by the
French company TAT European Airlines in September 1993.
This is the second Commission decision on the distribution
of traffic between airports within a single airport system
since the entry into force of the third package of air transport
liberalization measures on 1 January 1993 (see press release
IP(93) 432 regarding first decision).
The current rules for the distribution of traffic within the
Paris airport system are contained in a Decree adopted on 6
December 1993 by the French Minister for Transport. The
Decree provides that French domestic flights and flights
between France and Spain, Greece or Portugal can be
operated from either Orly or Charles de Gaulle airports, but
that only Charles de Gaulle can be used for the operation of
other intra-Community international air services, including
services between Paris and the United Kingdom.
The Commission considered that the distinction between
French domestic flights and other intra-Community flights
had discriminatory effects, in particular with regard to access
to French domestic connections operating from Orly. It
further considered that the measure ran contrary to the
Seitenansicht 22
1 2 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ... 66 67

Kommentare zu diesen Handbüchern

Keine Kommentare