
Vol. 1, N° 2, Summer 1994 EC COMPETITION POLICY NEWSLETTER PAGE 59
It was agreed that trade between the European Union and
Russia should take place free of unfair competition. The
parties have committed themselves to remedy or remove
through the application of their competition law or otherwise
restrictions on competition by enterprises or those caused by
state intervention. For the latter point there should be no
export aids favouring certain undertakings or the production
of products other than primary products. Furthermore, after
a transitional period of three years starting with the entry
into force of the PCA, strict discipline will be applicable to
other aids which distort or threaten to distort competition
affecting trade.
For a transitional period of five years starting with the entry
into force of the PCA, Russia has the right to use aids other
than export aids in order to support enterprises that are
undergoing restructuring, or those that are facing serious
difficulties, particularly when these difficulties entail serious
problems in Russia. A deviation from strict prohibition of
aids, other than direct export aids, is also possible in
situations where Russian enterprises face the elimination or
a drastic reduction of their total market shares or when
industries are just emerging.
In the case of State monopolies of a commercial character,
after a transitional period of three years, there shall be no
discrimination between nationals of the parties regarding the
conditions under which goods are procured or marketed.
Public undertakings or undertakings to which Member States
or Russia grant exclusive rights will also be subject to
competition rules.
The possibility is envisaged that these transitional periods
may be extended. The Cooperation Committee will be the
forum for consultation and information on competition rules.
The European Union has committed itself to providing
Russia with information on competition and with technical
assistance for the development and implementation of
competition rules.
It should be added that competition is one of the areas
covered by the obligation of approximation of legislation.
c) Other
NIS
Regarding Ukraine, a PCA similar to the one with Russia
was already signed earlier in 1994. The competition rules
contained therein are also similar to those concluded with
Russia.
Negotiations with Kazakhstan
and Kyrgyzstan have also led
in 1994 to the conclusion of PCAs. With respect to
competition rules it is foreseen that there shall be
approximation of legislation on the part of Kazakhstan and
Kyrgyzstan. Parties have further agreed that they shall
endeavour to use their competition laws on a concerted basis
in such cases where trade between them is affected.
III. Conclusion
This summary shows that competition rules are being
introduced in a modulated manner according to the degree of
integration of the partner's economy in the European Union
economy.
This should offer a recognisable legal environment for all
economic agents in the Union and in its partner countries.
The question arises now to examine whether the same logic
could be followed at a world-wide scale.
SECOND SEMINAR ON EUROPEAN UNION/JAPAN COMPETITION POLICY - BRUSSELS CONGRESS
CENTRE - FRIDAY 16 SEPTEMBER 1994
European Commissioner, Mr Karel Van Miert and
Japanese Fair Trade Commission Chairman, Mr Masami
Kogayu, are pleased to preside a Seminar on competition
issues to be held on September 16, 1994 in Brussels. This
Seminar is a follow-up to the one on competition policy held
in Tokyo on November 4, 1993 which compared the European
Union and Japanese approaches to a number of competition
issues which have particular relevance to international trade.
New challenges to competition policy have arisen with the
increasing globalization of the world economy. The growth of
international trade in goods and services, the increase in
foreign direct investment, the rising importance of
multinational companies, and the increasing operations of
private actors mean that events taking place in one market
sphere affect the competitivie situation in other market
spheres around the world.
Despite the important progress that has been attained in the
reduction of public obstacles to trade by the successive rounds
of the GATT, including the recent closure of Uruguay Round,
private restraints to trade have not been addressed. Private
restraints are being increasingly used to protect markets and
are just as damaging to free trade as are public restraints.
Therefore, bilateral cooperation in eliminating private
restraints would provide a secure framework for agreement on
competition issues until a multilateral accord is negotiated.
The Seminar scheduled for September 16, 1994, will allow
the European Union and the Japanese authorities to share their
experiences on competition policy and enforcement issues.
The Seminar will focus on important topics of concern to both
parties, namely 1) enforcement of competition laws and
deregulation, and 2) distribution problems.
Enforcement and deregulation issues will cover the impact
of competition policy on industry by addressing :
1. The effective implementation of existing regulations and,
2. The reinforcement of regulations and the extension of their
scope to all economic activity.
The topic of distribution will address how competition
policy can and must continue to improve distribution for the
benefit of consumers and to enhance the integration of
national economies. The speakers on these issues will be
representatives from both competition authorities but also
from all interested parties such as industry, consumer
associations, European Parliament and academic circles.
IP/94/647
Kommentare zu diesen Handbüchern